I don’t want your babies

[The author wishes to apologise for the fact that the following post will no doubt turn out to be as funny as an ill-thought-out stand-up routine on open mic night at a comedy club in Bicester. At midnight. After eight pints. Stop throwing things dammit!]

So. Babies in advertising eh? What’s that all about?

More specifically, the rollerblading babies that sell Evian. (Admittedly it’s a damning indictment of my inability to keep up with the times that they’ve been on our screens since at least July of last year but, hey, I needed something to write about.)

I don’t know where to begin with the damned things. Well obviously they’re rollerblading. That’s a little bit weird in the first place. BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY THEY’RE DOING IT WITHOUT PADS OR ANYTHING! What happens if they fall over? They’ll graze their knees or elbows and then  they’ll be wailing for absolutely ages, spoiling everyone else’s walk in the park. And they’re not wearing headgear. Jesus! What about their fontanelles?  I mean, look what happened to Natasha Richardson and she was in her 40s.

I know, I know. They’re not really rollerblading. It’s all CGI (I don’t care, they still look horribly wrong. I get the same feeling watching the ad as I do watching that bit in Trainspotting when the dead baby crawls along Renton’s ceiling).

But why are these babies rollerblading in a park? To sell Evian.

And this is where I get really, irrationally annoyed. The ad starts with the line “Let’s observe the effect of Evian on your body”. OK let’s observe it. Ah I see. It makes me feel like a baby. That can rollerblade. In its nappies. That’s a good effect.

Or maybe they’re trying to tell me that babies who drink Evian feel like that. Because babies drink loads of water, right? Their mums are forever complaining about how they have to express water from their H20-engorged breasts into empty Evian bottles so their little one can have a drink when they’re not around.

It’s borrowed interest at its worst.Like a lot of advertising these days.

But there was a time when it wasn’t like this. I remember an ad with an equally outlandish premise from the 80s(?) that was sheer brilliance. It was for the Vauxhall Astra Mk3 and it went something like this:

Now that’s a lovely, slightly bonkers idea that, above all, is relevant to the product it’s trying to sell. It dramatises the fact that the Mk3 is the car your baby would want you to own. Powerful stuff when you think about it.

[Note: No babies were harmed in the writing of this post. Although – and this could be an urban myth – the babies in the audience of the Vauxhall ad were apparently velcroed to their seats so they couldn’t crawl off. Anyone know if this is true?]


Tags: , , ,

4 Responses to “I don’t want your babies”

  1. Tim Says:

    I know I’m opening myself to be shouted at but… I thought the Evian ad was funny. There I’ve said it. Maybe because I have two small children.

  2. pixielation Says:

    I find the rollerskating babies cringeworthy, and I like the Astra add – and the difference between them is reality versus cgi.

    The problem with the rollerskating babies is the same inherant problem that all CGI animations suffer from – and that’s the real difficulty of mimicing reality correctly.

    How many times have you watched something cgi and not been able to shake the disconcerting feeling that the animal or human is not moving naturally. It’s not necessarily the motion of a limb, but perhaps the varying speeds that it needs to move at.

    And it’s even harder to mimic real action when that action has never been seen in real life. Unless they really did teach a baby to rollerskate, which is moderately unlikely.

    Even a midget with a baby’s head is going to fall short in that department.

    But good call on the helmets and knee pads. How irresponsible of them. What if people take their babies rollerskating without correct attire? Disaster.

  3. Hung Sing Says:

    I’d buy anything from a midget with a baby’s head…..

  4. jenny P Says:

    Tim, I thought it was funny too

    Although i agree chris, it is wrong

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: